Update to 2013-09-15 Post
- by rdman
- 2015-04-12 10:04:12
- General Posting
- 961 views
- 2 comments
(To further clarify my 2113-09-15 post, the RF ablation for the intermittent atrial flutter that was performed in 2009 also resulted in an apparent over-burn 1st degree AV Block.)
Subsequent to my 2013-09-15 post, one year later, I again mentioned the Boston Scientific pacemaker (BS) with Minute Ventilator (MV) sensor to my E/P. Since he had poo-pooed it in 2013, I was very surprised when he now enthusiastically endorsed the MV sensor feature for my active life and agreed to schedule a pacemaker exchange during the following month.
Since I felt very good with the Medtronic Adapta (except that I could not attain a heart rate to match my rigorous bicycle rides without banging-on-the-can), at this point, I asked a number of questions including - did the BS algorithms match the Medtronic Managed Ventricle Pacing (MVP). The E/P stated that BS was virtually the same. Satisfied that the BS pacer would mimic the Medronic including their MVP algorithm, the BS pacemaker implant date was set.
Following the BS implant and initial settings, I felt lousy - chest pressure and discomfort, throat sensations, PMT, PVCs, palpitations. Thinking these symptoms would resolve with further tweaking, I went through at least six comprehensive adjustments with senior technicians without significant improvement. It was during these adjustments when an very knowledgeable, independent pacemaker technician informed me that virtually the same is not the same thing as identical, explaining that BS methodology to pace the ventricle only when necessary is very different from the Medtronic patented, proprietary MVP. While the Medtronic was pacing at about 10%, the BS was now pacing the ventricle at 40% more.
During subsequent consults with the E/P, he agreed to remove the BS pacer after just four months and re-implant another Medtronic Adapta with MVP (four pacemaker implants within the last six years). However, at virtually the 11th hour while I was in surgery-prep, the E/P informed me that he was going to conduct an E/P mapping study instead of more guess-work!
After the five-hour mapping procedure, the E/P informed me while I was still foggy from sedation, then later when I was clear-headed, that the mapping study had revealed retrograde circuits in and around the AV node and dis-synchrony between the right and left ventricles. He proposed the following:
* He would attempt to ablate the source of the aberrant circuits within the AV node utilizing the cryogenic method which is more precise and forgiving than the RF method.
* Since he felt it was a long-shot to isolate the exact sweet spot on/in the AV node, the only other option would be to completely ablate the AV node which would result in total pacemaker dependency.
* If total dependency would result, a Medtronic CRT-P, 3-wire would be implanted. A 3rd lead, which was described as a very fine, thin wire, would also be attached on the right ventricle septum wall near the ablated AV node.
Aside from not fully understanding how this array works and having a very difficult time mentally having to go totally depend as apparently the last option, I have several other concerns.
* The original St. Jude leads are going on six years old. About a year ago, I was informed that the ventricle lead had slightly backed out of its attachment requiring signal strength adjustments. The recent mapping study revealed that this lead is not optimal.
With the advent of the Spectranetic power laser sheath that now provides safe extraction of old leads, would it not be good practice to remove these old, non-optimal leads and replace them with new leads?? This procedure is relatively new and requires highly skilled experience.
* The cryogenic ablation method also requires highly skilled experience. I have been informed that as of a month ago, my E/P has used the cryogenic method just one time.
I would be very appreciative and thankful for all members who wish to offer counsel, advice and support. Is total dependency my last option??? Thank you all!!
2 Comments
Lead extraction big deal
by doublehorn48 - 2015-04-13 08:04:57
Lead extraction is serious. My Dr. told me we would monitor the leads and hope they last until the pacemaker needs replacing, and then do the extraction. From what you write I wouldn't want your Dr. I would also get a second opinion.
You know you're wired when...
Like the Energizer Bunny, you keep going.
Member Quotes
You'll come to peace with it in time.
Get a second opinion
by golden_snitch - 2015-04-13 03:04:41
Hi!
First of all, I don't understand your pacemaker indication. I mean, a first degree heart block isn't really an indication, and most definitely it's none where you need the pacemaker's rate response sensor. Rate response is for people with lazy/sick sinus nodes, not for heart block patients whose sinus node works perfectly well.
Secondly, I've got the impression that you are probably not in the very best hands with that EP. If I were you, I'd get a second opinion. The BS feature to reduce ventricular pacing is not even virtually the same, it's a completely different algorithm. It paces you out of every single heart block, which explains why you now have a much higher pacing percentage. MVP paces you only, if it detects several blocks within a certain period of time. MVP allows some blocks to just happen, and only kicks in if the blocks appear frequently. Then your EP first says the minute ventilation is not good, and then one year later is happy to replace your Medtronic pacer with a BS pacer with minute ventilation. Then he changes his mind again, and does that mapping, without really having a reason for the mapping, if I understood that correctly. And the mapping took him 5 hours - what the heck did he do??? Nowadays, mappings are done much quicker. Even the very complicated Afib ablation procedure rarely takes more than 2-4 hours. And your EP just mapped and needed 5 hours? And now he wants to do a cryoablation, although he's practically very rarely done one before. My advice: Run away!!!
A bi-ventricular pacemaker is only indicated - according to AHA, HRS, EHRA etc. guidelines -, if you have a wide QRS complex of more than 140ms. If it's between 120-140ms, there is no clear benefit, and if it's shorter than 120ms, there is no data supporting any benefit at all. Also, from what I have heard, some insurances do not pay for this device, if your EF is greater than 40%. The third lead for the left ventricle is placed in the coronary vein that runs across the outside of the left ventricle. It is not attached to the ventricular septal wall!
Many people have retrograde conduction pathways, but they do not always cause problems. From your whole post I don't get whether you had any problems with it. I did have lots of highly symptomatic AV-dissociation, and retrograde conduction was part of that problem. Ended up with AV-node ablation, but only after four years of drugs (trying to suppress an accelerated junctional rhythm/tachycardia with retrograde conduction), and because I had already had seven ablations for other arrhythmias, and because I was already paced in the left ventricle.
Lead removal should only be done by very, very experienced EPs who do this procedure many times per years. I doubt that your EP belongs to that group.
I can only repeat what I already said: Run away and get a second opinion!
Good luck!